Security questionnaire drafts from approved documents. Inspect the evidence, spot the gaps, and review before sharing.
Local prototype · Deterministic processing · Mandatory human review
QUESTION 02
How is customer data encrypted at rest and in transit?
SUPPORTEDDRAFT ANSWER
Based on security_policy.md: Data at rest is encrypted with AES-256, and data in transit is encrypted with TLS 1.2 or higher.
SOURCE EXCERPTS
security_policy.md: "Data at rest is encrypted with AES-256, and data in transit is encrypted with TLS 1.2 or higher."
QUESTION 06
Do you use quantum-resistant encryption for all stored customer data?
CANDIDATEDRAFT ANSWER
Answer left blank for human review
SOURCE EXCERPTS
Zur Prüfung (der Zusammenhang zwischen Aussage und Frage ist nicht belegt): security_policy.md: "Data at rest is encrypted with AES-256, and data in transit is encrypted with TLS 1.2 or higher."
QUESTION 08
How often do you commission external penetration tests of the production platform?
GAPDRAFT ANSWER
Answer left blank for human review
SOURCE EXCERPTS
No supporting evidence found in approved documents.
QUESTION 04
For how long are security logs from production systems retained?
CONTRADICTIONDRAFT ANSWER
Answer left blank for human review
SOURCE EXCERPTS
operations_handbook.md: "Security logs from production systems are retained for 30 days according to the operations handbook."
security_policy.md: "Security logs from production systems are retained for 90 days and reviewed weekly."
Choose an evidence state above. This fixed example does not process documents.
THE WORKFLOW
A plausible sentence is not enough. Start with approved sources and make uncertainty visible.
The local prototype takes an XLSX questionnaire and approved .md or .txt documents. You decide which sources belong in the set.
Each question gets a source excerpt and evidence status. A related passage stays distinct from support for the actual claim.
Unsupported answers stay blank. A person checks every answer and resolves missing or conflicting evidence before sharing.
FOUR EVIDENCE STATES
The approved sample documents contain evidence for this draft. A person must still check the answer.
A related passage was found, but it does not demonstrate the claim. The answer stays blank.
No supporting evidence was found in the approved sample documents. The answer stays blank.
The approved sample documents disagree. Resolve the conflict before writing an answer.
WHERE IT STANDS
The current prototype runs locally and deterministically on XLSX questionnaires with approved Markdown and plain-text sources. The browser demo shows a fixed synthetic result; it does not run the questionnaire processor.
DealProof has not been validated with customers. It is not a commercial SaaS service, an automated compliance decision, or a certification. There are no customer accounts, uploads or paid plans here.
DealProof is a separate product prototype from Runrail, Veyact’s document-to-spreadsheet product.
LET’S UNDERSTAND THE WORK
Tell us roughly how many questionnaires you handle and which file formats you use. We can discuss whether a free pilot makes sense.
Discuss a free pilotPlease do not send confidential documents, questionnaire contents, customer data or credentials in your initial email.
contact@veyact.com ↗Free discussion. No purchase or pilot commitment.